↓ Skip to main content

Pain Research

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Pain Research'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Advancements in Pain Research
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Genomic Methods for Clinical and Translational Pain Research
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Two-Dimensional Gel Electrophoresis: Discovering Neuropathic Pain-Associated Synaptic Biomarkers in Spinal Cord Dorsal Horn
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Whole-Cell Patch-Clamp Recordings on Spinal Cord Slices
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Whole-Cell Recording in Isolated Primary Sensory Neurons
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Pain Research
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 An experimental model of headache-related pain.
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 A rodent model of trigeminal neuralgia.
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 New Models of Experimental Parotitis and Parotid Gland Distension in Rats
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 A Rat Pain Model of Facial Cancer
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Orofacial Pain Models and Behavior Assessment
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Pain Research
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 A Lumbosacral Ventral Root Avulsion Injury and Repair Model for Studies of Neuropathic Pain in Rats
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 A rat chronic pain model of spinal cord contusion injury.
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 The Spared Nerve Injury Model of Neuropathic Pain
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 A new rat pain model of thrombus-induced ischemia.
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Rat Models of Pancreatitis Pain
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 The Monosodium Iodoacetate Model of Osteoarthritis Pain in the Rat
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 K/BxN Serum Transfer Arthritis as a Model of Inflammatory Joint Pain
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 A New Rat Model of Bone Cancer Pain
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Exposure of the dorsal root ganglion to pulsed radiofrequency current in a neuropathic pain model of peripheral nerve injury.
Attention for Chapter 7: An experimental model of headache-related pain.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
An experimental model of headache-related pain.
Chapter number 7
Book title
Pain Research
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, February 2012
DOI 10.1007/978-1-61779-561-9_7
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-61779-560-2, 978-1-61779-561-9
Authors

Edelmayer RM, Ossipov MH, Porreca F, Rebecca M. Edelmayer, Michael H. Ossipov, Frank Porreca

Abstract

Migraine patients often demonstrate cutaneous allodynia, defined as a hypersensitivity of the skin to touch or mechanical stimuli that are normally innocuous. The allodynia sometimes begins intracranially and spreads, via unknown mechanisms, to extracranial regions. The goal of the study was to develop and validate a model of cutaneous allodynia triggered by dural inflammation for this aspect of pain associated with headaches. Inflammatory mediators (IM) were applied to the dura of non-anesthetized rats via previously implanted cannulas and sensory thresholds of the face and hindpaws were characterized. IM elicited robust and time-related facial and hindpaw allodynia which peaked after approximately 3 h. These effects were reminiscent of cutaneous allodynia seen in patients with migraine or other primary headache conditions, and were reversed by agents used clinically in the treatment of migraine. Facial and hindpaw allodynia associated with dural stimulation is a useful surrogate of allodynia associated with primary headache including migraine likely reflecting the development of central sensitization and may be exploited mechanistically for the development of novel therapeutic strategies for headache pain.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 4%
Brazil 1 4%
Unknown 23 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 6 24%
Researcher 4 16%
Student > Master 4 16%
Other 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 24%
Neuroscience 4 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 7 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2012.
All research outputs
#15,251,976
of 22,679,690 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,289
of 13,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,287
of 156,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#31
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,679,690 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,039 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,362 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.