↓ Skip to main content

Pain Research

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Pain Research'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Advancements in Pain Research
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Genomic Methods for Clinical and Translational Pain Research
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Two-Dimensional Gel Electrophoresis: Discovering Neuropathic Pain-Associated Synaptic Biomarkers in Spinal Cord Dorsal Horn
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Whole-Cell Patch-Clamp Recordings on Spinal Cord Slices
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Whole-Cell Recording in Isolated Primary Sensory Neurons
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Pain Research
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 An experimental model of headache-related pain.
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 A rodent model of trigeminal neuralgia.
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 New Models of Experimental Parotitis and Parotid Gland Distension in Rats
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 A Rat Pain Model of Facial Cancer
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Orofacial Pain Models and Behavior Assessment
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Pain Research
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 A Lumbosacral Ventral Root Avulsion Injury and Repair Model for Studies of Neuropathic Pain in Rats
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 A rat chronic pain model of spinal cord contusion injury.
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 The Spared Nerve Injury Model of Neuropathic Pain
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 A new rat pain model of thrombus-induced ischemia.
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Rat Models of Pancreatitis Pain
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 The Monosodium Iodoacetate Model of Osteoarthritis Pain in the Rat
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 K/BxN Serum Transfer Arthritis as a Model of Inflammatory Joint Pain
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 A New Rat Model of Bone Cancer Pain
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Exposure of the dorsal root ganglion to pulsed radiofrequency current in a neuropathic pain model of peripheral nerve injury.
Attention for Chapter 16: A new rat pain model of thrombus-induced ischemia.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
A new rat pain model of thrombus-induced ischemia.
Chapter number 16
Book title
Pain Research
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2012
DOI 10.1007/978-1-61779-561-9_16
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-61779-560-2, 978-1-61779-561-9
Authors

Jang-Hern Lee, Jong Suk Lee, Johannes Leisen, Rudra Prosad Choudhury, Robert M. Kriegel, Haskell W. Beckham, William J. Koros

Abstract

Pathophysiology of peripheral ischemic pain has not been fully demonstrated since the proper animal model has not been established. We designed this study to develop a new thrombus-induced ischemic pain (TIIP) animal model mimicking human peripheral ischemic pain by using ferrous chloride (FeCl(2)) in rats. Histological examination and Evans blue experiment revealed that the application of FeCl(2) onto the femoral artery produced an excessive thrombosis and ischemic condition in ipsilateral hind paw. Furthermore, ischemia-sensitive markers, such as hypoxia inducible factor-1 alpha (HIF-1α) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) were upregulated in the ipsilateral plantar muscles of FeCl(2)-applied rats. The mechanical allodynia was induced in bilateral hind paws from 1 day after FeCl(2) application and sustained for 30 days. However, thermal threshold of bilateral hind paws did not change in this animal model. In conclusion, we have developed a novel animal model of TIIP, which is characterized by the development of bilateral mechanical allodynia, but not thermal hyperalgesia. Thus, we suggest that this TIIP model can be useful in investigating the pathophysiological mechanisms that underlie human peripheral ischemic pain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 25%
Lecturer 1 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 25%
Materials Science 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2012.
All research outputs
#20,155,513
of 22,663,150 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#9,800
of 13,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,137
of 244,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#423
of 473 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,150 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,021 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,048 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 473 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.