You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Proof–Based Synthesis of Sorting Algorithms for Trees
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 43 |
| Book title |
Language and Automata Theory and Applications
|
| Published in |
Lecture notes in computer science, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-30000-9_43 |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-31-929999-0, 978-3-31-930000-9
|
| Authors |
Isabela Drămnesc, Tudor Jebelean, Sorin Stratulat, Drămnesc, Isabela, Jebelean, Tudor, Stratulat, Sorin |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 33% |
| Other | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 33% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2017.
All research outputs
#4,210,343
of 22,962,258 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#990
of 8,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,755
of 298,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#17
of 230 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,962,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,137 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 230 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.