↓ Skip to main content

Anaerobes in Biotechnology

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 5008: Anaerobic Probiotics: The Key Microbes for Human Health
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Anaerobic Probiotics: The Key Microbes for Human Health
Chapter number 5008
Book title
Anaerobes in Biotechnology
Published in
Advances in biochemical engineering biotechnology, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/10_2015_5008
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-945649-2, 978-3-31-945651-5
Authors

El Enshasy, Hesham, Malik, Khairuddin, Malek, Roslinda Abd, Othman, Nor Zalina, Elsayed, Elsayed Ahmed, Wadaan, Mohammad, Hesham El Enshasy, Khairuddin Malik, Roslinda Abd Malek, Nor Zalina Othman, Elsayed Ahmed Elsayed, Mohammad Wadaan

Abstract

Human gastrointestinal microbiota (HGIM) incorporate a large number of microbes from different species. Anaerobic bacteria are the dominant organisms in this microbial consortium and play a crucial role in human health. In addition to their functional role as the main source of many essential metabolites for human health, they are considered as biotherapeutic agents in the regulation of different human metabolites. They are also important in the prevention and in the treatment of different physical and mental diseases. Bifidobacteria are the dominant anaerobic bacteria in HGIM and are widely used in the development of probiotic products for infants, children and adults. To develop bifidobacteria-based bioproducts, therefore, it is necessary to develop a large-scale biomass production platform based on a good understanding of the ideal medium and bioprocessing parameters for their growth and viability. In addition, high cell viability should be maintained during downstream processing and storage of probiotic cell powder or the final formulated product. In this work we review the latest information about the biology, therapeutic activities, cultivation and industrial production of bifidobacteria.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 63 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 19%
Student > Master 11 17%
Researcher 6 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Other 3 5%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 19 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 9%
Neuroscience 4 6%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 20 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2022.
All research outputs
#15,268,080
of 24,677,985 outputs
Outputs from Advances in biochemical engineering biotechnology
#104
of 222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,962
of 304,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in biochemical engineering biotechnology
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,677,985 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,109 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.