↓ Skip to main content

Fabrication of Metal Nanoparticles from Fungi and Metal Salts: Scope and Application

Overview of attention for article published in Discover Nano, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
281 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
325 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fabrication of Metal Nanoparticles from Fungi and Metal Salts: Scope and Application
Published in
Discover Nano, February 2016
DOI 10.1186/s11671-016-1311-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Khwaja Salahuddin Siddiqi, Azamal Husen

Abstract

Fungi secrete enzymes and proteins as reducing agents which can be used for the synthesis of metal nanoparticles from metal salts. Large-scale production of nanoparticles from diverse fungal strains has great potential since they can be grown even in vitro. In recent years, various approaches have been made to maximize the yield of nanoparticles of varying shape, size, and stability. They have been characterized by thermogravimetric analysis, X-ray diffractometry, SEM/TEM, zeta potential measurements, UV-vis, and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. In this review, we focus on the biogenic synthesis of metal nanoparticles by fungi to explore the chemistry of their formation extracellularly and intracellularly. Emphasis has been given to the potential of metal nanoparticles as an antimicrobial agent to inhibit the growth of pathogenic fungi, and on other potential applications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 325 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 2 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 321 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 16%
Student > Master 49 15%
Researcher 37 11%
Student > Bachelor 29 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 4%
Other 42 13%
Unknown 102 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 9%
Chemistry 26 8%
Chemical Engineering 19 6%
Engineering 18 6%
Other 59 18%
Unknown 124 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2017.
All research outputs
#3,415,132
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Discover Nano
#52
of 1,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,643
of 313,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Discover Nano
#4
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,146 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,159 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.