You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Grid Computing — GRID 2000
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
Lecture notes in computer science, February 2000
|
| DOI | 10.1007/3-540-44444-0 |
| ISBNs |
978-3-54-041403-2, 978-3-54-044444-2
|
| Authors |
Rajkumar Buyya, Mark Baker |
| Editors |
Buyya, Rajkumar, Baker, Mark |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 200% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 200% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 100% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 100% |
| Researcher | 1 | 100% |
| Other | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 4 | 400% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 200% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 100% |
| Engineering | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2012.
All research outputs
#8,065,009
of 24,226,848 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#2,510
of 8,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,143
of 112,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#12
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,226,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,180 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.