↓ Skip to main content

Interplay between Metal Ions and Nucleic Acids

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 5: Metal Ion-Mediated DNA-Protein Interactions.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Metal Ion-Mediated DNA-Protein Interactions.
Chapter number 5
Book title
Interplay between Metal Ions and Nucleic Acids
Published in
Metal ions in life sciences, January 2012
DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-2172-2_5
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-9-40-072171-5, 978-9-40-072172-2
Authors

Zambelli B, Musiani F, Ciurli S, Barbara Zambelli, Francesco Musiani, Stefano Ciurli, Zambelli, Barbara, Musiani, Francesco, Ciurli, Stefano

Abstract

The dramatic changes in the environmental conditions that organisms encountered during evolution and adaptation to life in specific niches, have influenced intracellular and extracellular metal ion contents and, as a consequence, the cellular ability to sense and utilize different metal ions. This metal-driven differentiation is reflected in the specific panels of metal-responsive transcriptional regulators found in different organisms, which finely tune the intracellular metal ion content and all metal-dependent processes. In order to understand the processes underlying this complex metal homeostasis network, the study of the molecular processes that determine the protein-metal ion recognition, as well as how this event is transduced into a transcriptional output, is necessary. This chapter describes how metal ion binding to specific proteins influences protein interaction with DNA and how this event can influence the fate of genetic expression, leading to specific transcriptional outputs. The features of representative metal-responsive transcriptional regulators, as well as the molecular basis of metal-protein and protein-DNA interactions, are discussed on the basis of the structural information available. An overview of the recent advances in the understanding of how these proteins choose specific metal ions among the intracellular metal ion pool, as well as how they allosterically respond to their effector binding, is given.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 38%
Professor 2 15%
Other 1 8%
Lecturer 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 5 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Environmental Science 1 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2012.
All research outputs
#15,241,259
of 22,661,413 outputs
Outputs from Metal ions in life sciences
#128
of 134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,169
of 244,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Metal ions in life sciences
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,661,413 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 134 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.