↓ Skip to main content

In Silico Models for Drug Discovery

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 6: On Exploring Structure–Activity Relationships
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#13 of 13,410)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
28 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
342 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
On Exploring Structure–Activity Relationships
Chapter number 6
Book title
In Silico Models for Drug Discovery
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/978-1-62703-342-8_6
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-62703-341-1, 978-1-62703-342-8
Authors

Rajarshi Guha, Guha, Rajarshi

Editors

Sandhya Kortagere

Abstract

Understanding structure-activity relationships (SARs) for a given set of molecules allows one to rationally explore chemical space and develop a chemical series optimizing multiple physicochemical and biological properties simultaneously, for instance, improving potency, reducing toxicity, and ensuring sufficient bioavailability. In silico methods allow rapid and efficient characterization of SARs and facilitate building a variety of models to capture and encode one or more SARs, which can then be used to predict activities for new molecules. By coupling these methods with in silico modifications of structures, one can easily prioritize large screening decks or even generate new compounds de novo and ascertain whether they belong to the SAR being studied. Computational methods can provide a guide for the experienced user by integrating and summarizing large amounts of preexisting data to suggest useful structural modifications. This chapter highlights the different types of SAR modeling methods and how they support the task of exploring chemical space to elucidate and optimize SARs in a drug discovery setting. In addition to considering modeling algorithms, I briefly discuss how to use databases as a source of SAR data to inform and enhance the exploration of SAR trends. I also review common modeling techniques that are used to encode SARs, recent work in the area of structure-activity landscapes, the role of SAR databases, and alternative approaches to exploring SAR data that do not involve explicit model development.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 342 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 338 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 89 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 15%
Student > Master 35 10%
Researcher 20 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 4%
Other 23 7%
Unknown 110 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 78 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 52 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 37 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 3%
Other 33 10%
Unknown 116 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 235. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2022.
All research outputs
#141,926
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#13
of 13,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#844
of 196,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#1
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,410 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,490 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.