↓ Skip to main content

Echinoderm immunity.

Overview of attention for book
Overall attention for this book and its chapters
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Echinoderm immunity.
Published by
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2010
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-8059-5-14
Pubmed ID
ISBNs
978-1-4419-8058-8, 978-1-4419-8059-5
Authors

Smith, L Courtney, Ghosh, Julie, Buckley, Katherine M, Clow, Lori A, Dheilly, Nolwenn M, Haug, Tor, Henson, John H, Li, Chun, Lun, Cheng Man, Majeske, Audrey J, Matranga, Valeria, Nair, Sham V, Rast, Jonathan P, Raftos, David A, Roth, Mattias, Sacchi, Sandro, Schrankel, Catherine S, Stensvåg, Klara

Editors

Söderhäll, Kenneth

Abstract

A survey for immune genes in the genome for the purple sea urchin has shown that the immune system is complex and sophisticated. By inference, immune responses of all echinoderms maybe similar. The immune system is mediated by several types of coelomocytes that are also useful as sensors of environmental stresses. There are a number of large gene families in the purple sea urchin genome that function in immunity and of which at least one appears to employ novel approaches for sequence diversification. Echinoderms have a simpler complement system, a large set of lectin genes and a number of antimicrobial peptides. Profiling the immune genes expressed by coelomocytes and the proteins in the coelomic fluid provide detailed information about immune functions in the sea urchin. The importance of echinoderms in maintaining marine ecosystem stability and the disastrous effects of their removal due to disease will require future collaborations between ecologists and immunologists working towards understanding and preserving marine habitats.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 3%
Unknown 37 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 39%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 26%
Researcher 9 24%
Student > Master 6 16%
Other 5 13%
Other 13 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 63%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 32%
Environmental Science 8 21%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 8%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Other 6 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2022.
All research outputs
#2,004,639
of 22,849,304 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#280
of 4,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,869
of 164,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#4
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,849,304 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,952 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,056 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.