You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Compositional Analysis of the Human Microbiome in Cancer Research
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 16 |
| Book title |
Cancer Metabolism
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-9027-6_16 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-9026-9, 978-1-4939-9027-6
|
| Authors |
Elisa Morales, Jun Chen, K. Leigh Greathouse, Morales, Elisa, Chen, Jun, Greathouse, K. Leigh |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 7 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 17% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 22% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 9% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2019.
All research outputs
#6,094,131
of 23,128,387 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#1,796
of 13,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,400
of 437,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#14
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,128,387 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,268 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.