You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Foundations of Software Science and Computation Structures
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 12 |
| Book title |
Foundations of Software Science and Computation Structures
|
| Published in |
Lecture notes in computer science, April 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-662-46678-0_12 |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-66-246677-3, 978-3-66-246678-0
|
| Authors |
Giorgio Bacci, Giovanni Bacci, Kim Guldstrand Larsen, Radu Mardare, Bacci, Giorgio, Bacci, Giovanni, Larsen, Kim Guldstrand, Mardare, Radu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 33% |
| Researcher | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2016.
All research outputs
#5,761,495
of 22,876,619 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#1,871
of 8,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,521
of 264,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#21
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,876,619 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,130 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,705 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.