↓ Skip to main content

Nanotoxicity

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Nanotoxicity'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Historical Overview of Nanotechnology and Nanotoxicology
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Characterization of Nanomaterials for Toxicological Studies
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Methods for Understanding the Interaction Between Nanoparticles and Cells
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Single-Cell Gel Electrophoresis (Comet) Assay in Nano-genotoxicology
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Single-Cell Nanotoxicity Assays of Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Western Blot Analysis
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Application of Reverse Transcription-PCR and Real-Time PCR in Nanotoxicity Research
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Deriving TC 50 Values of Nanoparticles from Electrochemical Monitoring of Lactate Dehydrogenase Activity Indirectly
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay of IL-8 Production in Response to Silver Nanoparticles
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Metabolomics Techniques in Nanotoxicology Studies
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Nanoparticle Uptake Measured by Flow Cytometry
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Determining Biological Activity of Nanoparticles as Measured by Flow Cytometry
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Whole Cell Impedance Biosensoring Devices
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Free Energy Calculation of Permeant–Membrane Interactions Using Molecular Dynamics Simulations
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Screening of Fullerene Toxicity by Hemolysis Assay
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Assessment of In Vitro Skin Irritation Potential of Nanoparticles: RHE Model
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 In Vivo Methods of Nanotoxicology
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 The Luminescent Bacteria Test to Determine the Acute Toxicity of Nanoparticle Suspensions
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 The Primacy of Physicochemical Characterization of Nanomaterials for Reliable Toxicity Assessment: A Review of the Zebrafish Nanotoxicology Model
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Application of Embryonic and Adult Zebrafish for Nanotoxicity Assessment
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Applications of Subsurface Microscopy
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Application of ICP-MS for the Study of Disposition and Toxicity of Metal-Based Nanomaterials
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Quantitative Nanoparticle Organ Disposition by Gel Permeation Chromatography
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling for Nanoparticle Toxicity Study
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 Biophysical Methods for Assessing Plant Responses to Nanoparticle Exposure
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 In Vivo Nanotoxicity Assays in Plant Models
Overall attention for this book and its chapters
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nanotoxicity
Published by
Methods in molecular biology, January 2012
DOI 10.1007/978-1-62703-002-1
ISBNs
978-1-62703-001-4, 978-1-62703-002-1
Authors

Reineke, Joshua

Editors

Joshua Reineke

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 2%
Unknown 42 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 28%
Student > Bachelor 8 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 12%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 9 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 12%
Chemistry 5 12%
Environmental Science 3 7%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 12 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2024.
All research outputs
#4,222,818
of 25,443,857 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#1,033
of 14,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,988
of 250,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#63
of 493 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,443,857 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,191 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,352 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 493 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.