High Density Lipoproteins
Springer International Publishing
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
High-Density Lipoproteins in Stroke
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 16 |
| Book title |
High Density Lipoproteins
|
| Published in |
Handbook of experimental pharmacology, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-09665-0_16 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-31-909664-3, 978-3-31-909665-0
|
| Authors |
Olivier Meilhac, Meilhac, Olivier |
| Editors |
Arnold von Eckardstein, Dimitris Kardassis |
| Abstract |
Besides their well-documented function of reverse transport of cholesterol, high-density lipoproteins (HDLs) display pleiotropic effects due to their antioxidant, antithrombotic, anti-inflammatory and antiapoptotic properties that may play a major protective role in acute stroke, in particular by limiting the deleterious effects of ischaemia on the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and on the parenchymal cerebral compartment. HDLs may also modulate leukocyte and platelet activation, which may also represent an important target that would justify the use of HDL-based therapy in acute stroke. In this review, we will present an update of all the recent findings in HDL biology that could support a potential clinical use of HDL therapy in ischaemic stroke. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 11% |
| Researcher | 2 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 22% |
| Unknown | 6 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 28% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2015.
All research outputs
#17,735,364
of 22,775,504 outputs
Outputs from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#481
of 646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#247,730
of 361,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#53
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,775,504 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 646 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.