↓ Skip to main content

Biorefineries

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 64: From Current Algae Products to Future Biorefinery Practices: A Review
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
From Current Algae Products to Future Biorefinery Practices: A Review
Chapter number 64
Book title
Biorefineries
Published in
Advances in biochemical engineering biotechnology, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/10_2016_64
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-997117-9, 978-3-31-997119-3
Authors

Michel H. M. Eppink, Giuseppe Olivieri, Hans Reith, Corjan van den Berg, Maria J. Barbosa, Rene H. Wijffels, Eppink, Michel H. M., Olivieri, Giuseppe, Reith, Hans, van den Berg, Corjan, Barbosa, Maria J., Wijffels, Rene H.

Abstract

Microalgae are considered to be one of the most promising next generation bio-based/food feedstocks with a unique lipid composition, high protein content, and an almost unlimited amount of other bio-active molecules. High-value components such as the soluble proteins, (poly) unsaturated fatty acids, pigments, and carbohydrates can be used as an important ingredient for several markets, such as the food/feed/chemical/cosmetics and health industries. Although cultivation costs have decreased significantly in the last few decades, large microalgae production processes become economically viable if all complex compounds are optimally valorized in their functional state. To isolate these functional compounds from the biomass, cost-effective, mild, and energy-efficient biorefinery techniques need to be developed and applied. In this review we describe current microalgae biorefinery strategies and the derived products, followed by new technological developments and an outlook toward future products and the biorefinery philosophy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 132 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 17%
Student > Master 18 14%
Researcher 13 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 46 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 19 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 13%
Chemical Engineering 7 5%
Environmental Science 6 5%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 57 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2017.
All research outputs
#13,850,939
of 22,958,253 outputs
Outputs from Advances in biochemical engineering biotechnology
#96
of 225 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,217
of 307,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in biochemical engineering biotechnology
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,958,253 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,995 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them