↓ Skip to main content

Loss and Damage from Climate Change

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Loss and Damage from Climate Change'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Science for Loss and Damage. Findings and Propositions
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 The Ethical Challenges in the Context of Climate Loss and Damage
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Observed and Projected Impacts from Extreme Weather Events: Implications for Loss and Damage
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 The Risk and Policy Space for Loss and Damage: Integrating Notions of Distributive and Compensatory Justice with Comprehensive Climate Risk Management
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Attribution: How Is It Relevant for Loss and Damage Policy and Practice?
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 The Politics of (and Behind) the UNFCCC’s Loss and Damage Mechanism
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Legal Responses to Climate Change Induced Loss and Damage
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Non-economic Loss and Damage and the Warsaw International Mechanism
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 The Impacts of Climate Change on Ecosystem Services and Resulting Losses and Damages to People and Society
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Displacement and Resettlement: Understanding the Role of Climate Change in Contemporary Migration
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 The Role of the Physical Sciences in Loss and Damage Decision-Making
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Integrated Disaster Risk Management and Adaptation
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Exploring and Managing Adaptation Frontiers with Climate Risk Insurance
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Integrated Assessment for Identifying Climate Finance Needs for Loss and Damage: A Critical Review
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Understanding Loss and Damage in Pacific Small Island Developing States
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Climate Migration and Cultural Preservation: The Case of the Marshallese Diaspora
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Supporting Climate Risk Management at Scale. Insights from the Zurich Flood Resilience Alliance Partnership Model Applied in Peru & Nepal
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Loss and Damage in the Rapidly Changing Arctic
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Towards Establishing a National Mechanism to Address Losses and Damages: A Case Study from Bangladesh
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 The Case of Huaraz: First Climate Lawsuit on Loss and Damage Against an Energy Company Before German Courts
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Insurance as a Response to Loss and Damage?
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Technology for Climate Justice: A Reporting Framework for Loss and Damage as Part of Key Global Agreements
Attention for Chapter 6: The Politics of (and Behind) the UNFCCC’s Loss and Damage Mechanism
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
103 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
202 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
The Politics of (and Behind) the UNFCCC’s Loss and Damage Mechanism
Chapter number 6
Book title
Loss and Damage from Climate Change
Published in
Climate Risk Management, Policy and Governance, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-72026-5_6
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-972025-8, 978-3-31-972026-5
Authors

Elisa Calliari, Swenja Surminski, Jaroslav Mysiak, Calliari, Elisa, Surminski, Swenja, Mysiak, Jaroslav

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 202 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 16%
Researcher 17 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Lecturer 14 7%
Other 23 11%
Unknown 66 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 41 20%
Social Sciences 22 11%
Engineering 16 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 13 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 5%
Other 31 15%
Unknown 68 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,228,807
of 25,992,468 outputs
Outputs from Climate Risk Management, Policy and Governance
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,822
of 450,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climate Risk Management, Policy and Governance
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,992,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.1. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,184 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them