↓ Skip to main content

Cardiac Extracellular Matrix

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 2: Imaging the Cardiac Extracellular Matrix
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Imaging the Cardiac Extracellular Matrix
Chapter number 2
Book title
Cardiac Extracellular Matrix
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-97421-7_2
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-997420-0, 978-3-31-997421-7
Authors

Michael A. Pinkert, Rebecca A. Hortensius, Brenda M. Ogle, Kevin W. Eliceiri, Pinkert, Michael A., Hortensius, Rebecca A., Ogle, Brenda M., Eliceiri, Kevin W.

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease is the global leading cause of death. One route to address this problem is using biomedical imaging to measure the molecules and structures that surround cardiac cells. This cellular microenvironment, known as the cardiac extracellular matrix, changes in composition and organization during most cardiac diseases and in response to many cardiac treatments. Measuring these changes with biomedical imaging can aid in understanding, diagnosing, and treating heart disease. This chapter supports those efforts by reviewing representative methods for imaging the cardiac extracellular matrix. It first describes the major biological targets of ECM imaging, including the primary imaging target of fibrillar collagen. Then it discusses the imaging methods, describing their current capabilities and limitations. It categorizes the imaging methods into two main categories: organ-scale noninvasive methods and cellular-scale invasive methods. Noninvasive methods can be used on patients, but only a few are clinically available, and others require further development to be used in the clinic. Invasive methods are the most established and can measure a variety of properties, but they cannot be used on live patients. Finally, the chapter concludes with a perspective on future directions and applications of biomedical imaging technologies.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 15%
Researcher 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Other 2 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 4 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 12%
Chemical Engineering 2 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 7 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2024.
All research outputs
#8,239,130
of 24,682,395 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#1,347
of 5,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,113
of 346,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#21
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,682,395 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,643 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.