↓ Skip to main content

Serpins

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Serpins'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Overview of Serpins and Their Roles in Biological Systems
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Methods for Determining and Understanding Serpin Structure and Function: X-Ray Crystallography
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Serpin Phage Display: The Use of a T7 System to Probe Reactive Center Loop Libraries with Different Serine Proteinases
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Kinetic Measurement of Serpin Inhibitory Activity by Real-Time Fluorogenic Biochemical Assay
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Methods for Identifying Virus-Derived Serpins
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 In Vitro Approaches for the Assessment of Serpin Polymerization
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Cellular Models for the Serpinopathies
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Binding of Serpins to Immobilized Phospholipids and Phospholipids in Suspension
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Viral Serpin Reactive Center Loop (RCL) Peptides: Design and Testing
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 In Vivo Analysis of Alpha-1-Antitrypsin Functions in Autoimmune Disease Models
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Analysis of In Vivo Serpin Functions in Models of Inflammatory Vascular Disease
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Gene Delivery of Alpha-1-Antitrypsin Using Recombinant Adeno-Associated Virus (rAAV)
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Serpins in Venous Thrombosis and Venous Thrombus Resolution
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Next-Generation Sequencing Library Preparation for 16S rRNA Microbiome Analysis After Serpin Treatment
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Methods for Assessing Serpins as Neuroprotective Therapeutics
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Adeno-Associated Virus Delivery of Viral Serpins for Ocular Diseases: Design and Validation
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Serpins: Development for Therapeutic Applications
Attention for Chapter 7: Cellular Models for the Serpinopathies
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Cellular Models for the Serpinopathies
Chapter number 7
Book title
Serpins
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-8645-3_7
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-8644-6, 978-1-4939-8645-3
Authors

Annamaria Fra, Emanuela D’Acunto, Mattia Laffranchi, Elena Miranda, Fra, Annamaria, D’Acunto, Emanuela, Laffranchi, Mattia, Miranda, Elena

Abstract

Our current knowledge about the cellular mechanisms underlying serpin-related disorders, the serpinopathies, is predominantly based on studies in cell culture models of disease, particularly for alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT, SERPINA1) deficiency causing emphysema and the familial encephalopathy with neuroserpin (NS, SERPINI1) inclusion bodies (FENIB). FENIB, a neurodegenerative dementia, is caused by polymerization of NS (Miranda and Lomas, Cell Mol Life Sci 63:709-722, 2006; Roussel BD et al., Epileptic Disor 18:103-110, 2016), while AAT deficiency presents as a result of several divergent mutations in the AAT gene that cause lack of protein synthesis or complete intracellular degradation (null variants) or polymer formation (polymerogenic variants) (Lomas et al., J Hepatol 65:413-424, 2016; Greene et al., Nat Rev Dis Primers 2:16051, 2016; Ferrarotti et al. Orphanet J Rare D 9:172, 2014). Both diseases have been extensively modeled in cell culture systems by expressing mutant variants in a variety of ways. Here we describe the methodologies we follow in our cell model systems used to examine serpin disorders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 22%
Student > Master 2 22%
Unspecified 1 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Other 2 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 22%
Neuroscience 2 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 11%
Unspecified 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2018.
All research outputs
#20,533,292
of 23,103,436 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#9,978
of 13,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#292,783
of 336,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#187
of 247 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,436 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,208 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,306 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 247 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.