↓ Skip to main content

Behavioral Neurobiology of PTSD

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Behavioral Neurobiology of PTSD'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Integrating NIMH Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) into PTSD Research
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 30 The Future of Contextual Fear Learning for PTSD Research: A Methodological Review of Neuroimaging Studies
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 31 Sleep Disruption, Safety Learning, and Fear Extinction in Humans: Implications for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 32 MicroRNAs in Post-traumatic Stress Disorder
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 33 The Dissociative Subtype of Post-traumatic Stress Disorder: Research Update on Clinical and Neurobiological Features
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 34 Subanesthetic Dose Ketamine in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Role for Reconsolidation During Trauma-Focused Psychotherapy?
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 35 Emerging Approaches to Neurocircuits in PTSD and TBI: Imaging the Interplay of Neural and Emotional Trauma
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 38 Developmental Contributors to Trauma Response: The Importance of Sensitive Periods, Early Environment, and Sex Differences.
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 42 Neurobiological Programming of Early Life Stress: Functional Development of Amygdala-Prefrontal Circuitry and Vulnerability for Stress-Related Psychopathology
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 51 Does Anhedonia Presage Increased Risk of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder?
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 62 Neurocognition in PTSD: Treatment Insights and Implications
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 65 Animal Models of PTSD: A Critical Review
Attention for Chapter 30: The Future of Contextual Fear Learning for PTSD Research: A Methodological Review of Neuroimaging Studies
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
The Future of Contextual Fear Learning for PTSD Research: A Methodological Review of Neuroimaging Studies
Chapter number 30
Book title
Behavioral Neurobiology of PTSD
Published in
Current topics in behavioral neurosciences, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/7854_2017_30
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-994823-2, 978-3-31-994824-9
Authors

Daniel E. Glenn, Victoria B. Risbrough, Alan N. Simmons, Dean T. Acheson, Daniel M. Stout, Glenn, Daniel E., Risbrough, Victoria B., Simmons, Alan N., Acheson, Dean T., Stout, Daniel M.

Abstract

There has been a great deal of recent interest in human models of contextual fear learning, particularly due to the use of such paradigms for investigating neural mechanisms related to the etiology of posttraumatic stress disorder. However, the construct of "context" in fear conditioning research is broad, and the operational definitions and methods used to investigate contextual fear learning in humans are wide ranging and lack specificity, making it difficult to interpret findings about neural activity. Here we will review neuroimaging studies of contextual fear acquisition in humans. We will discuss the methodology associated with four broad categories of how contextual fear learning is manipulated in imaging studies (colored backgrounds, static picture backgrounds, virtual reality, and configural stimuli) and highlight findings for the primary neural circuitry involved in each paradigm. Additionally, we will offer methodological recommendations for human studies of contextual fear acquisition, including using stimuli that distinguish configural learning from discrete cue associations and clarifying how context is experimentally operationalized.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Student > Master 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Student > Bachelor 3 4%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 30 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 15 22%
Neuroscience 8 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 6%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Sports and Recreations 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 34 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2019.
All research outputs
#18,574,814
of 23,006,268 outputs
Outputs from Current topics in behavioral neurosciences
#400
of 498 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#311,426
of 421,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current topics in behavioral neurosciences
#33
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,006,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 498 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,241 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.