↓ Skip to main content

Progress in Medical Research

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 153: Effects of Manual Somatic Stimulation on the Autonomic Nervous System and Posture
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Effects of Manual Somatic Stimulation on the Autonomic Nervous System and Posture
Chapter number 153
Book title
Progress in Medical Research
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/5584_2018_153
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-989664-9, 978-3-31-989665-6
Authors

Giovanni Barassi, Rosa Grazia Bellomo, Camillo Di Giulio, Giuseppe Giannuzzo, Giuseppe Irace, Claudia Barbato, Raoul Saggini, Barassi, Giovanni, Bellomo, Rosa Grazia, Giulio, Camillo, Giannuzzo, Giuseppe, Irace, Giuseppe, Barbato, Claudia, Saggini, Raoul

Abstract

Low back pain frequently involves a multifactorial etiology and requires medical attention. The aim of the study was to assess the associations among pain, posture, and autonomic nervous system function in patients with low back pain, using neuromuscular manual therapy versus a generic peripheral manual stimulation (back massage therapy). Twenty young patients with low back pain were enrolled into the study. The patients were randomly divided into two groups: treated with neuromuscular manual therapy performed after a specific structural evaluation and treated with back massage therapy. Both groups performed eight sessions of 30 min each, once a week for two months. There were three main time points of the assessment: during the first, the fourth, and the last eighth session. In each of these three sessions, data were collected before onset of session (baseline), 5 min from onset, at end of session, and 5 min after the end. All patients were subjected to stabilometric evaluation and were assessed on a visual analogue scale to quantify postural and pain changes. Tabletop capnography and pulse oximetry were used to monitor autonomic changes. The findings were that the improvement in posture and pain reduction were appreciably better in patients subjected to neuromuscular manual therapy than in those subjected to back massage therapy, with a comparable autonomic response in both groups. In conclusion, the study demonstrates that posture modification was significantly more advantageous in patient treated with neuromuscular manual therapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 79 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 16%
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Researcher 5 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 6%
Other 3 4%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 37 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 17 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 13%
Arts and Humanities 3 4%
Computer Science 2 3%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 39 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2023.
All research outputs
#13,332,663
of 23,485,296 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#1,762
of 4,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,099
of 444,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#56
of 237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,485,296 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,898 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,814 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.