You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Evaluation of Pregnancy Malaria Vaccine Candidates: The Binding Inhibition Assay.
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 19 |
Book title |
Malaria Vaccines
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2015
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-2815-6_19 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-2814-9, 978-1-4939-2815-6
|
Authors |
Saveria, Tracy, Duffy, Patrick E, Fried, Michal, Tracy Saveria, Patrick E. Duffy, Michal Fried |
Editors |
Ashley Vaughan |
Abstract |
The parasite-binding inhibition assay is designed to evaluate the acquisition of naturally acquired functional antibodies that block Plasmodium falciparum binding to endothelial or placental receptors. The assay is also used to assess functional activity by antibodies induced by immunization, for example antibodies raised against pregnancy malaria vaccine candidates like VAR2CSA. Here we describe a plate-based assay to measure the levels of adhesion-blocking antibodies. This assay format can be adapted to any lab that is minimally equipped for short-term parasite culture. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Belgium | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 18 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 9 | 47% |
Lecturer | 2 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 11% |
Librarian | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 11% |
Unknown | 1 | 5% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 37% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 11% |
Computer Science | 1 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 11% |
Unknown | 4 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2015.
All research outputs
#18,428,159
of 22,829,683 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,918
of 13,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,898
of 353,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#481
of 997 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,683 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,125 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,161 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 997 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.