↓ Skip to main content

Modeling Methods for Medical Systems Biology

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 1: Medical Systems Biology
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Medical Systems Biology
Chapter number 1
Book title
Modeling Methods for Medical Systems Biology
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-89354-9_1
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-989353-2, 978-3-31-989354-9
Authors

María Elena Álvarez-Buylla Roces, Juan Carlos Martínez-García, José Dávila-Velderrain, Elisa Domínguez-Hüttinger, Mariana Esther Martínez-Sánchez

Abstract

The aim of this volume is to encourage the use of systems-level methodologies to contribute to the improvement of human-health . We intend to motivate biomedical researchers to complement their current theoretical and empirical practice with up-to-date systems biology conceptual approaches. Our perspective is based on the deep understanding of the key biomolecular regulatory mechanisms that underlie health, as well as the emergence and progression of human-disease . We strongly believe that the contemporary systems biology perspective opens the door to the effective development of novel methodologies to the improvement of prevention . This requires a deeper and integrative understanding of the involved underlying systems-level mechanisms. In order to explain our proposal in a simple way, in this chapter we privilege the conceptual exposition of our chosen framework over formal considerations. The formal exposition of our proposal will be expanded and discussed later in the next chapters.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Librarian 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 40%
Computer Science 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2018.
All research outputs
#7,574,392
of 23,098,660 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#1,237
of 4,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,782
of 330,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#10
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,098,660 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,976 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.