↓ Skip to main content

Chromosomal Instability in Cancer Cells

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 5: Causes of Chromosomal Instability.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Causes of Chromosomal Instability.
Chapter number 5
Book title
Chromosomal Instability in Cancer Cells
Published in
Recent results in cancer research Fortschritte der Krebsforschung Progrès dans les recherches sur le cancer, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-20291-4_5
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-920290-7, 978-3-31-920291-4
Authors

Bastians, Holger, Holger Bastians

Abstract

The majority of human cancer cells are highly aneuploid harboring chromosome numbers deviating from the modal number of 46. In cancer, aneuploidy is a consequence of an increased rate of whole chromosome missegregation during mitosis, a process known as chromosomal instability (CIN). In fact, CIN is a hallmark of human cancer and is thought to contribute to tumorigenesis, tumor progression, and the development of therapy resistance by providing a high genetic variability that might foster rapid adaptation processes. However, the molecular mechanisms that cause chromosome missegregation in cancer cells are still poorly understood. So far, several mechanisms underlying CIN have been proposed and some of them are indeed detectable in human cancer cells exhibiting CIN. Examples include, for instance, weakened spindle checkpoint signaling, supernumerary centrosomes, defects in chromatid cohesion, abnormal kinetochore-microtubule attachments and increased spindle microtubule dynamics. Here, the mechanisms leading to CIN in human cancer cells are summarized.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 74 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 30%
Researcher 13 18%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 8%
Student > Master 5 7%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 12 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 33 45%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Unspecified 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 15 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2016.
All research outputs
#18,426,826
of 22,828,180 outputs
Outputs from Recent results in cancer research Fortschritte der Krebsforschung Progrès dans les recherches sur le cancer
#119
of 171 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,871
of 353,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Recent results in cancer research Fortschritte der Krebsforschung Progrès dans les recherches sur le cancer
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,828,180 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 171 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,128 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.