↓ Skip to main content

Experimental Models of Cardiovascular Diseases

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Experimental Models of Cardiovascular Diseases'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Experimental Models of Cardiovascular Diseases: Overview
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 An Introduction to Computational Modeling of Cardiac Electrophysiology and Arrhythmogenicity
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Isolation of Atrial and Ventricular Cardiomyocytes for In Vitro Studies
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Cardiomyocyte Differentiation from Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Cardiomyocyte Differentiation from Human Embryonic Stem Cells
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Induction of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells to Cardiomyocytes Using Embryoid Bodies
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Measuring Cardiomyocyte Contractility and Calcium Handling In Vitro
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Langendorff Perfusion Method as an Ex Vivo Model to Evaluate Heart Function in Rats
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Methods for the Preparation of an Excised, Cross-Circulated Rat Heart
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Optical Action Potential Mapping in Acute Models of Ischemia–Reperfusion Injury: Probing the Arrhythmogenic Role of the Mitochondrial Translocator Protein
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Cardiac Tissue Engineering Models of Inherited and Acquired Cardiomyopathies
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Badimon Perfusion Chamber: An Ex Vivo Model of Thrombosis
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Ischemic Model of Heart Failure in Rats and Mice
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Conventional Method of Transverse Aortic Constriction in Mice
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Characterization of the Differential Progression of Left Ventricular Remodeling in a Rat Model of Pressure Overload Induced Heart Failure. Does Clip Size Matter?
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Isoproterenol-Induced Heart Failure Mouse Model Using Osmotic Pump Implantation
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Rat Model of Cardiotoxic Drug-Induced Cardiomyopathy
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Pulmonary Artery Hypertension Model in Rats by Monocrotaline Administration
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 The Sugen 5416/Hypoxia Mouse Model of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Mouse Model of Wire Injury-Induced Vascular Remodeling
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 The Mouse Aortocaval Fistula Model with Intraluminal Drug Delivery
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 A Pig Model of Myocardial Infarction: Catheter-Based Approaches
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Ovine Model of Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Canine Model of Pacing-Induced Heart Failure
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 Swine Model of Mitral Regurgitation Induced Heart Failure
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 Pig Model of Increased Cardiac Afterload Induced by Ascending Aortic Banding
  28. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 27 Large Porcine Model of Profound Acute Ischemic Cardiogenic Shock
  29. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 28 Chronic Pulmonary Artery Embolization Models in Large Animals
  30. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 29 Modeling Pulmonary Hypertension: A Pig Model of Postcapillary Pulmonary Hypertension
  31. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 30 Development and Multiparametric Evaluation of Experimental Atherosclerosis in Rabbits
Attention for Chapter 29: Modeling Pulmonary Hypertension: A Pig Model of Postcapillary Pulmonary Hypertension
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Modeling Pulmonary Hypertension: A Pig Model of Postcapillary Pulmonary Hypertension
Chapter number 29
Book title
Experimental Models of Cardiovascular Diseases
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-8597-5_29
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-8596-8, 978-1-4939-8597-5
Authors

Olympia Bikou, Kiyotake Ishikawa, Kenneth M. Fish, Iratxe Zarragoikoetxea, Roger J. Hajjar, Jaume Aguero, Bikou, Olympia, Ishikawa, Kiyotake, Fish, Kenneth M., Zarragoikoetxea, Iratxe, Hajjar, Roger J., Aguero, Jaume

Abstract

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a pathophysiological condition defined as an increase in mean pulmonary arterial pressure ≥25 mmHg at rest assessed by right heart catheterization.Based on hemodynamic criteria, precapillary PH is characterized by a mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressure ≤15 mmHg as opposed to the postcapillary PH by >15 mmHg. Postcapillary PH is one of the most common forms of PH, often caused by left ventricular dysfunction and heart failure.In this chapter, we describe protocols for creating a large animal model of postcapillary PH. It is induced by open chest surgery (lateral thoracotomy) to band the pulmonary veins. The model is characterized by low mortality, relatively easy surgical procedure with well reproducible results, and pulmonary and cardiac remodeling at the structural, functional, and molecular levels. The presence of right ventricular (RV) remodeling is of significant importance since right heart failure is the main cause of death in patients suffering from PH. One of the advantages of the model described in this chapter is that both adaptive and maladaptive forms of RV remodeling can be observed during the progression of the disease. This can help understand the progressive pathophysiology of RV failure in humans. Besides the description of the model, a detailed guidance of the RV functional assessment in pigs for both invasive (heart catheterization) and noninvasive (echocardiography) approaches is provided.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 24%
Student > Bachelor 4 24%
Librarian 1 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 6%
Unknown 7 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 12%
Sports and Recreations 1 6%
Engineering 1 6%
Unknown 8 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2018.
All research outputs
#15,539,088
of 23,094,276 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,412
of 13,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,134
of 442,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#596
of 1,499 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,094,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,208 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,499 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.