↓ Skip to main content

Immune Responses to Biosurfaces

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 3: Role of Complement on Broken Surfaces After Trauma.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Role of Complement on Broken Surfaces After Trauma.
Chapter number 3
Book title
Immune Responses to Biosurfaces
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-18603-0_3
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-918602-3, 978-3-31-918603-0
Authors

Huber-Lang, Markus, Ignatius, Anita, Brenner, Rolf E, Markus Huber-Lang, Anita Ignatius, Rolf E. Brenner, Brenner, Rolf E.

Abstract

Activation of both the complement and coagulation cascade after trauma and subsequent local and systemic inflammatory response represent a major scientific and clinical problem. After severe tissue injury and bone fracture, exposure of innate immunity to damaged cells and molecular debris is considered a main trigger of the posttraumatic danger response. However, the effects of cellular fragments (e.g., histones) on complement activation remain enigmatic. Furthermore, direct effects of "broken" bone and cartilage surfaces on the fluid phase response of complement and its interaction with key cells of connective tissues are still unknown. Here, we summarize data suggesting direct and indirect complement activation by extracellular and cellular danger associated molecular patterns. In addition, key complement components and the corresponding receptors (such as C3aR, C5aR) have been detected on "exposed surfaces" of the damaged regions. On a cellular level, multiple effects of complement activation products on osteoblasts, osteoclasts, chondrocytes and mesenchymal stem cells have been found.In conclusion, the complement system may be activated by trauma-altered surfaces and is crucially involved in connective tissue healing and posttraumatic systemic inflammatory response.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 20%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Professor 1 7%
Student > Master 1 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 7%
Materials Science 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2015.
All research outputs
#20,712,517
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#4,018
of 4,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#298,604
of 355,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#190
of 272 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,989 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 272 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.