↓ Skip to main content

Metallomics

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 4: Metallomics Study in Plants Exposed to Arsenic, Mercury, Selenium and Sulphur
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Metallomics Study in Plants Exposed to Arsenic, Mercury, Selenium and Sulphur
Chapter number 4
Book title
Metallomics
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-90143-5_4
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-990142-8, 978-3-31-990143-5
Authors

Jörg Feldmann, Katharina Bluemlein, Eva Maria Krupp, Martin Mueller, Barry Alan Wood, Feldmann, Jörg, Bluemlein, Katharina, Krupp, Eva Maria, Mueller, Martin, Wood, Barry Alan

Abstract

This chapter is focussing on the interaction of arsenic, mercury and selenium with plans. Aspects of biotransformations are discussed, before the analytical methodologies are listed and critically appraised in the second part. A holistic view is given, starting from the soil environment and continuing to the plant roots and the translocations into the upper part of the plants. Under different soil conditions, different kinds of elemental species are identified, which have an impact on how the elemental species are taken up by the plant. The uptake mechanisms of these elemental species are explained and compared before the biotransformation reactions of all elemental species in the plant root; their transport into the vacuoles and translocation to the leaves and grains are discussed. Here in particular the interaction with sulphur-rich phytochelatins is described for all three elemental species. Since the sulphur chemistry is so important for the uptake, bioaccumulation and translocation of the metals and metalloids, a subchapter about sulphur chemistry in plants has been added. All aspects of biotransformation dealt with in this chapter is finally rounded up by a thorough description of the analytical methodology given with a focus on the use of HPLC-ICPMS/ESI-MS for both quantitative and molecular analysis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 19%
Student > Master 3 19%
Researcher 2 13%
Professor 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 4 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 19%
Engineering 2 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Unspecified 1 6%
Environmental Science 1 6%
Other 3 19%
Unknown 4 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2018.
All research outputs
#20,522,137
of 23,090,520 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#4,001
of 4,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#378,473
of 442,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#197
of 237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,090,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,976 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.