You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Preparation of Polymeric and Composite Scaffolds by 3D Bioprinting
|
|---|---|
| Book title |
Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology
|
| Published in |
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-76711-6_10 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-31-976710-9, 978-3-31-976711-6
|
| Authors |
Ana Mora-Boza, María Luisa Lopez-Donaire |
| Abstract |
Over the recent years, the advent of 3D bioprinting technology has marked a milestone in osteochondral tissue engineering (TE) research. Nowadays, the traditional used techniques for osteochondral regeneration remain to be inefficient since they cannot mimic the complexity of joint anatomy and tissue heterogeneity of articular cartilage. These limitations seem to be solved with the use of 3D bioprinting which can reproduce the anisotropic extracellular matrix (ECM) and heterogeneity of this tissue. In this chapter, we present the most commonly used 3D bioprinting approaches and then discuss the main criteria that biomaterials must meet to be used as suitable bioinks, in terms of mechanical and biological properties. Finally, we highlight some of the challenges that this technology must overcome related to osteochondral bioprinting before its clinical implementation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 13 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 19% |
| Engineering | 5 | 19% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 15 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2018.
All research outputs
#14,353,367
of 23,090,520 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#2,097
of 4,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,172
of 326,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,090,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,976 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,623 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.