You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Representing Flexible Role-Based Access Control Policies Using Objects and Defeasible Reasoning
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 24 |
Book title |
Rule Technologies: Foundations, Tools, and Applications
|
Published in |
Lecture notes in computer science, July 2015
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-21542-6_24 |
Book ISBNs |
978-3-31-921541-9, 978-3-31-921542-6
|
Authors |
Reza Basseda, Tiantian Gao, Michael Kifer, Steven Greenspan, Charley Chell |
Editors |
Nick Bassiliades, Georg Gottlob, Fariba Sadri, Adrian Paschke, Dumitru Roman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2015.
All research outputs
#14,232,642
of 22,818,766 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#4,311
of 8,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,300
of 262,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#89
of 353 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,818,766 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,124 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 353 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.