You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Methods for Genomic Characterization and Maintenance of Anaerobic Fungi
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 5 |
| Book title |
Fungal Genomics
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-7804-5_5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-7803-8, 978-1-4939-7804-5
|
| Authors |
Xuefeng Peng, Candice L. Swift, Michael K. Theodorou, Michelle A. O’Malley, Peng, Xuefeng, Swift, Candice L., Theodorou, Michael K., O’Malley, Michelle A. |
| Abstract |
The rapid development of molecular biology and bioinformatics has fueled renewed interests in anaerobic fungi from the phylum Neocallimastigomycota. This chapter presents well-established methods for isolation, routine cultivation, and cryopreservation of anaerobic fungi. Moreover, detailed nucleic acid extraction protocols are provided, which should enable readers to isolate high-quality DNA and RNA from a variety of anaerobic fungal culture media for downstream applications such as next-generation sequencing. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 39% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 17% |
| Researcher | 3 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemical Engineering | 5 | 28% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 6% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2018.
All research outputs
#18,294,766
of 23,498,099 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,482
of 13,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#313,455
of 444,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#862
of 1,485 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,498,099 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,368 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,485 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.