You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Digital Libraries Current Issues
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
Lecture notes in computer science, January 1995
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bfb0026845 |
| ISBNs |
978-3-54-059282-2, 978-3-54-049230-6
|
| Authors |
Nabil R. Adam, Bharat K. Bhargava, Yelena Yesha |
| Editors |
Nabil R. Adam, Bharat K. Bhargava, Yelena Yesha |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 50% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 2 | 50% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2008.
All research outputs
#5,651,047
of 22,818,766 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#1,818
of 8,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,753
of 76,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#7
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,818,766 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,124 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,296 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.