↓ Skip to main content

Digital Libraries Research and Technology Advances

Overview of attention for book
Digital Libraries Research and Technology Advances
Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Communicating NASA's science to the public
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 The library of congress's national digital library program
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 The Universal Library: Intelligent agents and information on demand
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Building a scalable America
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Video as scholarly material in the digital library
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Digital libraries for electronic news
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 WebJournal: Visualization of a Web Journey
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Uniform structured document handling using a constraint-based object approach
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Digital software and data repositories for support of scientific computing
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Semantic hypermedia retrieval in digital libraries
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Fuzzy full-text searches in OCR databases
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Data discovery in large scale heterogeneous and autonomous databases
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 An intelligent agent for the K-12 educational community
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Interface issues for interactive multimedia documents
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Searching and discovery of resources in digital libraries
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 The Almaden distributed digital library system
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Alexandria digital library: Rapid prototype and metadata schema
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 The ELINOR electronic library
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Dienst: Building a production technical report server
Overall attention for this book and its chapters
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Digital Libraries Research and Technology Advances
Published by
Lecture notes in computer science, January 1996
DOI 10.1007/bfb0024597
ISBNs
978-3-54-061410-4, 978-3-54-068527-2
Authors

Nabil R. Adam, Bharat K. Bhargava, Milton Halem, Yelena Yesha

Editors

Nabil R. Adam, Bharat K. Bhargava, Milton Halem, Yelena Yesha

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2008.
All research outputs
#5,651,047
of 22,818,766 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#1,818
of 8,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,298
of 79,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#4
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,818,766 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,124 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,236 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.