You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
The Design and Implementation of Chinese Rural Studies Database
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 69 |
Book title |
Digital Libraries: Achievements, Challenges and Opportunities
|
Published in |
Lecture notes in computer science, January 2006
|
DOI | 10.1007/11931584_69 |
Book ISBNs |
978-3-54-049375-4, 978-3-54-049377-8
|
Authors |
Jianhua Wu, Fang Lin, Haiyan Chen, Xian Zhang, Jing Wang, Li Li |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 2 | 33% |
Professor | 1 | 17% |
Student > Master | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 17% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 17% |
Computer Science | 1 | 17% |
Materials Science | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2012.
All research outputs
#3,253,363
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#753
of 8,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,545
of 154,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#17
of 146 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,122 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 146 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.