You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
The B36/S125 “2x2” Life-Like Cellular Automaton
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 7 |
| Book title |
Game of Life Cellular Automata
|
| Published in |
arXiv, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-84996-217-9_7 |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-84996-216-2, 978-1-84996-217-9
|
| Authors |
Nathaniel Johnston |
| Editors |
Andrew Adamatzky |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2012.
All research outputs
#2,735,199
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from arXiv
#48,739
of 928,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,370
of 156,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from arXiv
#185
of 3,095 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 928,103 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,095 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.