↓ Skip to main content

Cell Biology and Translational Medicine, Volume 3

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 216: Challenges in Bio-fabrication of Organoid Cultures
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Challenges in Bio-fabrication of Organoid Cultures
Chapter number 216
Book title
Cell Biology and Translational Medicine, Volume 3
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/5584_2018_216
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-03-004184-7, 978-3-03-004185-4
Authors

Weijie Peng, Pallab Datta, Yang Wu, Madhuri Dey, Bugra Ayan, Amer Dababneh, Ibrahim T. Ozbolat, Peng, Weijie, Datta, Pallab, Wu, Yang, Dey, Madhuri, Ayan, Bugra, Dababneh, Amer, Ozbolat, Ibrahim T.

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) organoids have shown advantages in cell culture over traditional two-dimensional (2D) culture, and have great potential in various applications of tissue engineering. However, there are limitations in current organoid fabrication technologies, such as uncontrolled size, poor reproductively, and inadequate complexity of organoids. In this chapter, we present the existing techniques and discuss the major challenges for 3D organoid biofabrication. Future perspectives on organoid bioprinting are also discussed, where bioprinting technologies are expected to make a major contribution in organoid fabrication, such as realizing mass production and constructing complex heterotypic tissues, and thus further advance the translational application of organoids in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine as well drug testing and pharmaceutics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 25%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 19 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 20%
Engineering 14 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 8%
Chemical Engineering 5 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 5%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 26 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2018.
All research outputs
#15,533,651
of 23,085,832 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#2,526
of 4,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,117
of 442,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#111
of 237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,085,832 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,976 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,628 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.