↓ Skip to main content

Modeling Fragile X Syndrome

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Modeling Fragile X Syndrome'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Introduction: Reminiscing on Models and Modeling
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Probing Astrocyte Function in Fragile X Syndrome
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Neural Stem Cells
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein (FMRP) and the Spinal Sensory System
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 The Role of the Postsynaptic Density in the Pathology of the Fragile X Syndrome
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Behavior in a Drosophila Model of Fragile X
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Molecular and Genetic Analysis of the Drosophila Model of Fragile X Syndrome
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein and Stem Cells
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Manipulating the fragile x mental retardation proteins in the frog.
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Exploring the Zebra Finch Taeniopygia guttata as a Novel Animal Model for the Speech–Language Deficit of Fragile X Syndrome
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Neuroendocrine Alterations in the Fragile X Mouse
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Taking STEPs Forward to Understand Fragile X Syndrome
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Fmr-1 as an Offspring Genetic and a Maternal Environmental Factor in Neurodevelopmental Disease
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Mouse Models of the Fragile X Premutation and the Fragile X Associated Tremor/Ataxia Syndrome
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Clinical Aspects of the Fragile X Syndrome
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Fragile X Syndrome: A Psychiatric Perspective
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Fragile X Syndrome and Targeted Treatment Trials
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 The Fragile X-Associated Tremor Ataxia Syndrome
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Vignettes: Models in Absentia
Attention for Chapter 17: Fragile X Syndrome and Targeted Treatment Trials
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#19 of 217)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Fragile X Syndrome and Targeted Treatment Trials
Chapter number 17
Book title
Modeling Fragile X Syndrome
Published in
Results and problems in cell differentiation, January 2012
DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-21649-7_17
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-64-221648-0, 978-3-64-221649-7
Authors

Randi Hagerman, Julie Lauterborn, Jacky Au, Elizabeth Berry-Kravis, Hagerman, Randi, Lauterborn, Julie, Au, Jacky, Berry-Kravis, Elizabeth

Abstract

Work in recent years has revealed an abundance of possible new treatment targets for fragile X syndrome (FXS). The use of animal models, including the fragile X knockout mouse which manifests a phenotype very similar to FXS in humans, has resulted in great strides in this direction of research. The lack of Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein (FMRP) in FXS causes dysregulation and usually overexpression of a number of its target genes, which can cause imbalances of neurotransmission and deficits in synaptic plasticity. The use of metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR) blockers and gamma amino-butyric acid (GABA) agonists have been shown to be efficacious in reversing cellular and behavioral phenotypes, and restoring proper brain connectivity in the mouse and fly models. Proposed new pharmacological treatments and educational interventions are discussed in this chapter. In combination, these various targeted treatments show promising preliminary results in mitigating or even reversing the neurobiological abnormalities caused by loss of FMRP, with possible translational applications to other neurodevelopmental disorders including autism.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Spain 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 97 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 14%
Researcher 12 12%
Other 6 6%
Other 18 18%
Unknown 22 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 16%
Neuroscience 12 12%
Psychology 11 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 7%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 22 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2023.
All research outputs
#7,238,286
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Results and problems in cell differentiation
#19
of 217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,748
of 253,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Results and problems in cell differentiation
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 217 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,347 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them