↓ Skip to main content

Modeling Fragile X Syndrome

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Modeling Fragile X Syndrome'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Introduction: Reminiscing on Models and Modeling
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Probing Astrocyte Function in Fragile X Syndrome
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Neural Stem Cells
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein (FMRP) and the Spinal Sensory System
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 The Role of the Postsynaptic Density in the Pathology of the Fragile X Syndrome
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Behavior in a Drosophila Model of Fragile X
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Molecular and Genetic Analysis of the Drosophila Model of Fragile X Syndrome
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein and Stem Cells
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Manipulating the fragile x mental retardation proteins in the frog.
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Exploring the Zebra Finch Taeniopygia guttata as a Novel Animal Model for the Speech–Language Deficit of Fragile X Syndrome
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Neuroendocrine Alterations in the Fragile X Mouse
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Taking STEPs Forward to Understand Fragile X Syndrome
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Fmr-1 as an Offspring Genetic and a Maternal Environmental Factor in Neurodevelopmental Disease
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Mouse Models of the Fragile X Premutation and the Fragile X Associated Tremor/Ataxia Syndrome
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Clinical Aspects of the Fragile X Syndrome
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Fragile X Syndrome: A Psychiatric Perspective
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Fragile X Syndrome and Targeted Treatment Trials
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 The Fragile X-Associated Tremor Ataxia Syndrome
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Vignettes: Models in Absentia
Attention for Chapter 9: Manipulating the fragile x mental retardation proteins in the frog.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Manipulating the fragile x mental retardation proteins in the frog.
Chapter number 9
Book title
Modeling Fragile X Syndrome
Published in
Results and problems in cell differentiation, January 2012
DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-21649-7_9
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-64-221648-0, 978-3-64-221649-7
Authors

Marc-Etienne Huot, Nicolas Bisson, Thomas Moss, Edouard W. Khandjian, Huot, Marc-Etienne, Bisson, Nicolas, Moss, Thomas, Khandjian, Edouard W.

Abstract

The frog is a model of choice to study gene function during early development, since a large number of eggs are easily obtained and rapidly develop external to the mother. This makes it a highly flexible model system in which direct tests of gene function can be investigated by microinjecting RNA antisense reagents. Two members of the Fragile X Related (FXR) gene family, namely xFmr1 and xFxr1 have been identified in Xenopus. While the tissue distribution of their products was found to be identical to that in mammals, the pattern of isoform expression is less complex. Translational silencing of the xFmr1 and xFxr1 mRNAs by microinjection of antisense morpholino oligonucleotides (MO) induced dramatic morphological alterations, revealing tissue-specific requirements for each protein during development and in maintaining the steady state levels of a range of transcripts in these tissues. The power and versatility of the frog model is that the MO-induced phenotypes can be rescued by microinjection of the corresponding MO-insensitive mRNAs. Most importantly, this animal model allows one rapidly to determine whether any member of the FXR family can compensate for the absence of another, an approach that cannot be performed in other animal models.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 22%
Student > Master 2 22%
Professor 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Unknown 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 56%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 33%
Unknown 1 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2011.
All research outputs
#13,658,669
of 22,655,397 outputs
Outputs from Results and problems in cell differentiation
#70
of 215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,010
of 244,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Results and problems in cell differentiation
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,655,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 215 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,018 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.