↓ Skip to main content

Errata

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Materials Research, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Errata
Published in
Journal of Materials Research, March 2011
DOI 10.1557/jmr.2004.0148
Authors

A. Murugaiah, M.W. Barsoum, S.R. Kalidindi, T. Zhen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 4%
China 2 4%
India 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 49 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 36%
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Professor 4 7%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 7 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 28 50%
Engineering 11 20%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Chemistry 1 2%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 12 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2011.
All research outputs
#7,563,204
of 23,070,218 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Research
#307
of 1,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,626
of 109,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Research
#181
of 1,244 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,070,218 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,826 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,476 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,244 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.