You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A functional-anatomical approach to the spine-pelvis mechanism: interaction between the biceps femoris muscle and the sacrotuberous ligament
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Spine Journal, October 1993
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00301411 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J. P. van Wingerden, A. Vleeming, C. J. Snijders, R. Stoeckart |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 85 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 13% |
| Researcher | 10 | 11% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 20% |
| Unknown | 19 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 11% |
| Sports and Recreations | 10 | 11% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 29 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2021.
All research outputs
#7,048,788
of 23,065,445 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#887
of 4,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,745
of 20,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,065,445 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,684 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 20,897 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them