↓ Skip to main content

Principles of Safety Pharmacology

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Principles of Safety Pharmacology'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 A Historical View and Vision into the Future of the Field of Safety Pharmacology
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 In Vitro Early Safety Pharmacology Screening: Perspectives Related to Cardiovascular Safety
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Safety Pharmacology in Drug Discovery and Development
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 CNS Adverse Effects: From Functional Observation Battery/Irwin Tests to Electrophysiology
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Preclinical Abuse Potential Assessment
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Overview of Respiratory Studies to Support ICH S7A
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Biophysics and Molecular Biology of Cardiac Ion Channels for the Safety Pharmacologist
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Sensitivity and Specificity of the In Vitro Guinea Pig Papillary Muscle Action Potential Duration for the Assessment of Drug-Induced Torsades De Pointes Liability in Humans
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Haemodynamic Assessment in Safety Pharmacology
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 High Definition Oscillometry: Non-invasive Blood Pressure Measurement and Pulse Wave Analysis
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 The Safety Pharmacology of Auditory Function
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Principles of Safety Pharmacology
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Principles of Safety Pharmacology
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Inclusion of Safety Pharmacology Endpoints in Repeat-Dose Toxicity Studies
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Safety Pharmacology Evaluation of Biopharmaceuticals.
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Safety Pharmacology of Anticancer Agents
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Clinical ECG Assessment
Attention for Chapter 15: Safety Pharmacology Evaluation of Biopharmaceuticals.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Safety Pharmacology Evaluation of Biopharmaceuticals.
Chapter number 15
Book title
Principles of Safety Pharmacology
Published in
Handbook of experimental pharmacology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-46943-9_15
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-66-246942-2, 978-3-66-246943-9
Authors

Amouzadeh, Hamid R, Engwall, Michael J, Vargas, Hugo M, Hamid R. Amouzadeh, Michael J. Engwall, Hugo M. Vargas, Amouzadeh, Hamid R., Engwall, Michael J., Vargas, Hugo M.

Abstract

Biotechnology-derived pharmaceuticals or biopharmaceuticals (BPs) are molecules such as monoclonal antibodies, soluble/decoy receptors, hormones, enzymes, cytokines, and growth factors that are produced in various biological expression systems and are used to diagnose, treat, or prevent various diseases. Safety pharmacology (SP) assessment of BPs has evolved since the approval of the first BP (recombinant human insulin) in 1982. This evolution is ongoing and is informed by various international harmonization guidelines. Based on these guidelines, the potential undesirable effect of every drug candidate (small molecule or BP) on the cardiovascular, central nervous, and respiratory systems, referred to as the "core battery," should be assessed prior to first-in-human administration. However, SP assessment of BPs poses unique challenges such as choice of test species and integration of SP parameters into repeat-dose toxicity studies. This chapter reviews the evolution of SP assessment of BPs using the approval packages of marketed BPs and discusses the past, current, and new and upcoming approach and methods that can be used to generate high-quality data for the assessment of SP of BPs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 29%
Other 3 13%
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 13%
Engineering 2 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Other 5 21%
Unknown 8 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2015.
All research outputs
#20,280,315
of 22,813,792 outputs
Outputs from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#570
of 648 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#295,836
of 353,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#59
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,813,792 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 648 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,106 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.