Chapter title |
Sensitivity and Specificity of the In Vitro Guinea Pig Papillary Muscle Action Potential Duration for the Assessment of Drug-Induced Torsades De Pointes Liability in Humans
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 8 |
Book title |
Principles of Safety Pharmacology
|
Published in |
Handbook of experimental pharmacology, January 2015
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-3-662-46943-9_8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-3-66-246942-2, 978-3-66-246943-9
|
Authors |
Joffrey Ducroq, Ducroq, Joffrey |
Abstract |
The ICH S7B document, which provides guidance for the preclinical cardiovascular evaluation of pharmaceutical new chemical entities (NCE), is essentially focused on drug-induced QT lengthening, a biomarker for the proarrhythmic adverse drug reaction, torsades de pointes (TdP). In 2005, this guidance recommended the IKr assay and the in vivo QT telemetry study as mandatory assays for detecting potential torsades de pointes liability and relegated the cardiac action potential (AP) assay as a follow-up study. The IKr assay has become a mandatory screening tool in the early development and safety assessment process. Using only the IKr assay as a go/no go decision arbiter is regrettable since, due to the low specificity of the model (positives that are false for proarrhythmia liability, e.g. verapamil), promising, safe NCEs may be inadvertently discarded. Inclusion of additional medium throughput assays should be performed early to confirm or balance the putatively unfavourable IKr result with positive discovery model output (Pugsley et al., J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods 60:24-27, 2009). In the present chapter, the predictive value of in vitro guinea pig papillary muscle action potential assay will be discussed in terms of sensitivity and specificity and compared to currently available preclinical models such as IKr/hERG assay, dog Purkinje fibre action potential and in vivo QT measurements in dog and cynomolgus monkey. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 33% |
Librarian | 1 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 17% |
Student > Master | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 17% |
Psychology | 1 | 17% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 17% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 17% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 17% |
Other | 1 | 17% |