↓ Skip to main content

Principles of Safety Pharmacology

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Principles of Safety Pharmacology'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 A Historical View and Vision into the Future of the Field of Safety Pharmacology
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 In Vitro Early Safety Pharmacology Screening: Perspectives Related to Cardiovascular Safety
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Safety Pharmacology in Drug Discovery and Development
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 CNS Adverse Effects: From Functional Observation Battery/Irwin Tests to Electrophysiology
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Preclinical Abuse Potential Assessment
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Overview of Respiratory Studies to Support ICH S7A
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Biophysics and Molecular Biology of Cardiac Ion Channels for the Safety Pharmacologist
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Sensitivity and Specificity of the In Vitro Guinea Pig Papillary Muscle Action Potential Duration for the Assessment of Drug-Induced Torsades De Pointes Liability in Humans
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Haemodynamic Assessment in Safety Pharmacology
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 High Definition Oscillometry: Non-invasive Blood Pressure Measurement and Pulse Wave Analysis
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 The Safety Pharmacology of Auditory Function
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Principles of Safety Pharmacology
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Principles of Safety Pharmacology
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Inclusion of Safety Pharmacology Endpoints in Repeat-Dose Toxicity Studies
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Safety Pharmacology Evaluation of Biopharmaceuticals.
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Safety Pharmacology of Anticancer Agents
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Clinical ECG Assessment
Attention for Chapter 1: A Historical View and Vision into the Future of the Field of Safety Pharmacology
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
A Historical View and Vision into the Future of the Field of Safety Pharmacology
Chapter number 1
Book title
Principles of Safety Pharmacology
Published in
Handbook of experimental pharmacology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-46943-9_1
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-66-246942-2, 978-3-66-246943-9
Authors

Bass, Alan S, Hombo, Toshiyasu, Kasai, Chieko, Kinter, Lewis B, Valentin, Jean-Pierre, Alan S. Bass, Toshiyasu Hombo, Chieko Kasai, Lewis B. Kinter, Jean-Pierre Valentin, Bass, Alan S., Kinter, Lewis B.

Abstract

Professor Gerhard Zbinden recognized in the 1970s that the standards of the day for testing new candidate drugs in preclinical toxicity studies failed to identify acute pharmacodynamic adverse events that had the potential to harm participants in clinical trials. From his vision emerged the field of safety pharmacology, formally defined in the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) S7A guidelines as "those studies that investigate the potential undesirable pharmacodynamic effects of a substance on physiological functions in relation to exposure in the therapeutic range and above." Initially, evaluations of small-molecule pharmacodynamic safety utilized efficacy models and were an ancillary responsibility of discovery scientists. However, over time, the relationship of these studies to overall safety was reflected by the regulatory agencies who, in directing the practice of safety pharmacology through guidance documents, prompted transition of responsibility to drug safety departments (e.g., toxicology). Events that have further shaped the field over the past 15 years include the ICH S7B guidance, evolution of molecular technologies leading to identification of new therapeutic targets with uncertain toxicities, introduction of data collection using more sophisticated and refined technologies, and utilization of transgenic animal models probing critical scientific questions regarding novel targets of toxicity. The collapse of the worldwide economy in the latter half of the first decade of the twenty-first century, continuing high rates of compound attrition during clinical development and post-approval and sharply increasing costs of drug development have led to significant strategy changes, contraction of the size of pharmaceutical organizations, and refocusing of therapeutic areas of investigation. With these changes has come movement away from dedicated internal safety pharmacology capability to utilization of capabilities within external contract research organizations. This movement has created the opportunity for the safety pharmacology discipline to come "full circle" and return to the drug discovery arena (target identification through clinical candidate selection) to contribute to the mitigation of the high rate of candidate drug failure through better compound selection decision making. Finally, the changing focus of science and losses in didactic training of scientists in whole animal physiology and pharmacology have revealed a serious gap in the future availability of qualified individuals to apply the principles of safety pharmacology in support of drug discovery and development. This is a significant deficiency that at present is only partially met with academic and professional society programs advancing a minimal level of training. In summary, with the exception that the future availability of suitably trained scientists is a critical need for the field that remains to be effectively addressed, the prospects for the future of safety pharmacology are hopeful and promising, and challenging for those individuals who want to assume this responsibility. What began in the early part of the new millennium as a relatively simple model of testing to assure the safety of Phase I clinical subjects and patients from acute deleterious effects on life-supporting organ systems has grown with experience and time to a science that mobilizes the principles of cellular and molecular biology and attempts to predict acute adverse events and those associated with long-term treatment. These challenges call for scientists with a broad range of in-depth scientific knowledge and an ability to adapt to a dynamic and forever changing industry. Identifying individuals who will serve today and training those who will serve in the future will fall to all of us who are committed to this important field of science.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 8 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 21%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 10 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2015.
All research outputs
#13,631,076
of 23,112,054 outputs
Outputs from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#332
of 648 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,991
of 354,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#38
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,112,054 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 648 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,635 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.