↓ Skip to main content

Issues in Clinical Epileptology: A View from the Bench

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Issues in Clinical Epileptology: A View from the Bench'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 How Can We Identify Ictal and Interictal Abnormal Activity?
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 What Is the Clinical Relevance of In Vitro Epileptiform Activity?
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 What Is the Importance of Abnormal “Background” Activity in Seizure Generation?
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 What Is a Seizure Focus?
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 What Is a Seizure Network? Long-Range Network Consequences of Focal Seizures
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 What Is a Seizure Network? Very Fast Oscillations at the Interface Between Normal and Epileptic Brain
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Is There Such a Thing as “Generalized” Epilepsy?
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Are There Really “Epileptogenic” Mechanisms or Only Corruptions of “Normal” Plasticity?
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 When and How Do Seizures Kill Neurons, and Is Cell Death Relevant to Epileptogenesis?
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 How Is Homeostatic Plasticity Important in Epilepsy?
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Is Plasticity of GABAergic Mechanisms Relevant to Epileptogenesis?
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Do Structural Changes in GABA Neurons Give Rise to the Epileptic State?
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Does Mossy Fiber Sprouting Give Rise to the Epileptic State?
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Does Brain Inflammation Mediate Pathological Outcomes in Epilepsy?
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Are Changes in Synaptic Function That Underlie Hyperexcitability Responsible for Seizure Activity?
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Does Epilepsy Cause a Reversion to Immature Function?
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Are Alterations in Transmitter Receptor and Ion Channel Expression Responsible for Epilepsies?
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 How Do We Make Models That Are Useful in Understanding Partial Epilepsies?
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Aligning Animal Models with Clinical Epilepsy: Where to Begin?
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 What Non-neuronal Mechanisms Should Be Studied to Understand Epileptic Seizures?
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 What Epilepsy Comorbidities Are Important to Model in the Laboratory? Clinical Perspectives
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Epilepsy Comorbidities: How Can Animal Models Help?
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 What New Modeling Approaches Will Help Us Identify Promising Drug Treatments?
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 What are the arguments for and against rational therapy for epilepsy?
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 How Can Advances in Epilepsy Genetics Lead to Better Treatments and Cures?
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 How Might Novel Technologies Such as Optogenetics Lead to Better Treatments in Epilepsy?
Attention for Chapter 26: How Might Novel Technologies Such as Optogenetics Lead to Better Treatments in Epilepsy?
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
How Might Novel Technologies Such as Optogenetics Lead to Better Treatments in Epilepsy?
Chapter number 26
Book title
Issues in Clinical Epileptology: A View from the Bench
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-94-017-8914-1_26
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-9-40-178913-4, 978-9-40-178914-1
Authors

Esther Krook-Magnuson, Marco Ledri, Ivan Soltesz, Merab Kokaia, Krook-Magnuson, Esther, Ledri, Marco, Soltesz, Ivan, Kokaia, Merab

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 38%
Researcher 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 2 25%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 13%
Physics and Astronomy 1 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2018.
All research outputs
#5,962,262
of 23,054,359 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#930
of 4,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,161
of 306,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#28
of 139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,054,359 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,974 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,711 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.