You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
How Can We Identify Ictal and Interictal Abnormal Activity?
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 1 |
| Book title |
Issues in Clinical Epileptology: A View from the Bench
|
| Published in |
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-94-017-8914-1_1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-9-40-178913-4, 978-9-40-178914-1
|
| Authors |
Robert S. Fisher, Helen E. Scharfman, Marco deCurtis, Fisher, Robert S., Scharfman, Helen E., deCurtis, Marco |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 214 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 32 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 13% |
| Other | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 31 | 14% |
| Unknown | 53 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 55 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 13% |
| Engineering | 25 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 5% |
| Psychology | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 26 | 12% |
| Unknown | 62 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2019.
All research outputs
#7,674,618
of 24,652,007 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#1,217
of 5,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,069
of 316,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#40
of 144 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,652,007 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,221 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,664 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 144 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.