↓ Skip to main content

Behavioral Neuroscience of Learning and Memory

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 455: The Anatomy and Physiology of Eyeblink Classical Conditioning
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
The Anatomy and Physiology of Eyeblink Classical Conditioning
Chapter number 455
Book title
Behavioral Neuroscience of Learning and Memory
Published in
Current topics in behavioral neurosciences, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/7854_2016_455
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-978755-8, 978-3-31-978757-2
Authors

Kaori Takehara-Nishiuchi, Takehara-Nishiuchi, Kaori

Abstract

This chapter reviews the past research toward identifying the brain circuit and its computation underlying the associative memory in eyeblink classical conditioning. In the standard delay eyeblink conditioning paradigm, the conditioned stimulus (CS) and eyeblink-eliciting unconditioned stimulus (US) converge in the cerebellar cortex and interpositus nucleus (IPN) through the pontine nuclei and inferior olivary nucleus. Repeated pairings of CS and US modify synaptic weights in the cerebellar cortex and IPN, enabling IPN neurons to activate the red nucleus and generate the conditioned response (CR). In a variant of the standard paradigm, trace eyeblink conditioning, the CS and US are separated by a brief stimulus-free trace interval. Acquisition in trace eyeblink conditioning depends on several forebrain regions, including the hippocampus and medial prefrontal cortex as well as the cerebellar-brainstem circuit. Details of computations taking place in these regions remain unclear; however, recent evidence supports a view that the forebrain encodes a temporal sequence of the CS, trace interval, and US in a specific environmental context and signals the cerebellar-brainstem circuit to execute the CR when the US is likely to occur. Together, delay eyeblink conditioning represents one of the most successful cases of understanding the neural substrates of long-term memory in mammals, while trace eyeblink conditioning demonstrates its utility for uncovering detailed computations in the whole brain network underlying long-term memory.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Other 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 11 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 4 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 15 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2019.
All research outputs
#7,557,593
of 23,053,169 outputs
Outputs from Current topics in behavioral neurosciences
#220
of 500 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,848
of 394,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current topics in behavioral neurosciences
#45
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,053,169 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 500 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,784 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.