↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter: Testing Susceptibility of Patient-Derived Organoid Cultures to Therapies: Pharmacotyping
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Testing Susceptibility of Patient-Derived Organoid Cultures to Therapies: Pharmacotyping
Book title
Phenotypic Screening
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-7847-2_19
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-7846-5, 978-1-4939-7847-2
Authors

Richard A. Burkhart, Lindsey A. Baker, Hervé Tiriac

Abstract

Increasingly, patient models of disease are being utilized to facilitate precision medicine approaches through molecular characterization or direct chemotherapeutic testing. Organoids, 3-dimensional (3D) cultures of neoplastic cells derived from primary tumor specimens, represent an ideal platform for these types of studies because benchtop protocols previously developed for 2-dimensional cell lines can be adapted for use. These protocols include directly testing the survival of these organoid cultures when exposed to clinically relevant chemotherapeutic agents, a process we have called pharmacotyping. In this protocol, established tumor-derived organoid cultures are dissociated into single cells, plated in a 3D gel matrix, and exposed to pharmacologic agents. While our protocol has been developed for use with patient-derived pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma organoids, with minor modifications to the dissociation and medium conditions, this protocol could be adapted for use with a wide range of organoid cultures. We further describe our standard ATP-based assay to determine cellular survival. This protocol can be scaled for use in high-throughput assays.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 18%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 7 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 9%
Chemistry 2 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2018.
All research outputs
#18,606,163
of 23,047,237 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,994
of 13,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#330,638
of 442,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#950
of 1,499 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,047,237 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,196 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,433 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,499 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.