↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter: The Ancient Genetic Networks of Obesity: Whole-Animal Automated Screening for Conserved Fat Regulators
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
The Ancient Genetic Networks of Obesity: Whole-Animal Automated Screening for Conserved Fat Regulators
Book title
Phenotypic Screening
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-7847-2_10
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-7846-5, 978-1-4939-7847-2
Authors

Wenfan Ke, Anna Drangowska-Way, Daniel Katz, Karsten Siller, Eyleen J. O’Rourke

Abstract

Caenorhabditis elegans is the first and only metazoan model that enables whole-body gene knockdown by simply feeding their standard laboratory diet, E. coli, carrying RNA interference (RNAi)-expressing constructs. The simplicity of the RNAi treatment, small size, and fast reproduction rate of C. elegans allow us to perform whole-animal high-throughput genetic screens in wild-type, mutant, or otherwise genetically modified C. elegans. In addition, more than 65% of C. elegans genes are conserved in mammals including human. In particular, C. elegans metabolic pathways are highly conserved, which supports the study of complex diseases such as obesity in this genetically tractable model system. In this chapter, we present a detailed protocol for automated high-throughput whole-animal RNAi screening to identify the pathways promoting obesity in diet-induced and genetically driven obese C. elegans. We describe an optimized high-content screening protocol to score fat mass and body fat distribution in whole animals at large scale. We provide optimized pipelines to automatically score phenotypes using the open-source CellProfiler platform within the context of supercomputer clusters. Further, we present a guideline to optimize information workflow from the automated microscope to a searchable database. The approaches described here enable unveiling the whole network of gene-gene and gene-environment interactions that define metabolic health or disease status in this proven model of human disease, but similar principles can be applied to other disease models.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Unspecified 1 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Other 3 21%
Unknown 4 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 14%
Chemical Engineering 1 7%
Environmental Science 1 7%
Unspecified 1 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Other 4 29%
Unknown 4 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2019.
All research outputs
#14,107,269
of 23,047,237 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#3,977
of 13,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#232,793
of 442,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#397
of 1,499 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,047,237 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,196 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,433 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,499 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.