You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Graph-Theoretic Concepts in Computer Science
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
Lecture notes in computer science, January 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1007/b93953 |
| ISBNs |
978-3-54-020452-7, 978-3-54-039890-5
|
| Authors |
Hans L. Bodlaender |
| Editors |
Bodlaender, Hans L. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 12 | 86% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematics | 1 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 12 | 86% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2024.
All research outputs
#7,422,018
of 22,691,736 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#2,490
of 8,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,452
of 128,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#41
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,691,736 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,942 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.