↓ Skip to main content

Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology Volume 237

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 4: Exposure to Crystal Violet, Its Toxic, Genotoxic and Carcinogenic Effects on Environment and Its Degradation and Detoxification for Environmental Safety
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
389 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Exposure to Crystal Violet, Its Toxic, Genotoxic and Carcinogenic Effects on Environment and Its Degradation and Detoxification for Environmental Safety
Chapter number 4
Book title
Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology Volume 237
Published in
Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-23573-8_4
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-923572-1, 978-3-31-923573-8
Authors

Sujata Mani, Ram Naresh Bharagava, Mani, Sujata, Bharagava, Ram Naresh

Abstract

Crystal Violet (CV), a triphenylmethane dye, has been extensively used in human and veterinary medicine as a biological stain, as a textile dye in textile processing industries and also used to provide a deep violet color to paints and printing ink. CV is also used as a mutagenic and bacteriostatic agent in medical solutions and antimicrobial agent to prevent the fungal growth in poultry feed. Inspite of its many uses, CV has been reported as a recalcitrant dye molecule that persists in environment for a long period of time and pose toxic effects. It acts as a mitotic poison, potent carcinogen and a potent clastogene promoting tumor growth in some species of fish. Thus, CV is regarded as a biohazard substance. Although, there are several physico-chemical methods such as adsorption, coagulation and ion-pair extraction reported for the removal of CV, but these methods are insufficient for the complete removal of CV from industrial wastewaters and also produce large quantity of sludge containing secondary pollutants. However, biological methods are regarded as cost-effective and eco-friendly for the treatment of industrial wastewaters, but these methods also have certain limitations. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop such eco-friendly and cost-effective biological treatment methods, which can effectively remove the dye from industrial wastewaters for the safety of environment, as well as human and animal health.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 389 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 389 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 59 15%
Student > Bachelor 32 8%
Researcher 27 7%
Student > Master 24 6%
Lecturer 12 3%
Other 37 10%
Unknown 198 51%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 59 15%
Chemical Engineering 20 5%
Engineering 16 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 3%
Materials Science 10 3%
Other 50 13%
Unknown 223 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2019.
All research outputs
#7,977,154
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#73
of 186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,519
of 400,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#13
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 186 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.