↓ Skip to main content

Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology Volume 237

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 3: Environmental Fate and Toxicology of Dimethoate
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Environmental Fate and Toxicology of Dimethoate
Chapter number 3
Book title
Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology Volume 237
Published in
Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-23573-8_3
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-923572-1, 978-3-31-923573-8
Authors

April Van Scoy, Ashley Pennell, Xuyang Zhang, Scoy, April Van, Pennell, Ashley, Zhang, Xuyang, Van Scoy, April, Scoy, April

Abstract

The insecticide dimethoate, an organophosphate, was first introduced in 1962 for broad spectrum control of a wide range of insects including mites, flies, aphids, and plant hoppers. It is known to inhibit AChE activity like other organophosphates, resulting in nerve damage which may lead to death. In the environment, hydrolysis represents a major degradation pathway under alkaline conditions, whereas volatilization is not a major route of dissipation from either water or moist soils. Dimethoate is also degraded by microbes under anaerobic conditions and the major degradation product, omethoate, has been identified. Dimethoate has been found to adversely impact many organisms. In plants, photosynthesis and growth are highly impacted, whereas birds exhibit inhibition in brain enzyme activity, thus sublethal effects are apparent. Aquatic organisms are expected to be highly impacted via direct exposure and display changes in swimming behavior.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 64 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 22%
Student > Bachelor 9 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Lecturer 3 5%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 17 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 19%
Environmental Science 9 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 9%
Engineering 5 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 19 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2023.
All research outputs
#8,248,433
of 24,704,144 outputs
Outputs from Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#74
of 190 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,910
of 404,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#13
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,704,144 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 190 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,281 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.