You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Genetic Risk Models in Age-Related Macular Degeneration
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 37 |
Book title |
Retinal Degenerative Diseases
|
Published in |
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, March 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4614-3209-8_37 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-4614-3208-1, 978-1-4614-3209-8
|
Authors |
Felix Grassmann, Iris M. Heid, Bernhard H. F. Weber, Grassmann, Felix, Heid, Iris M., Weber, Bernhard H. F. |
Abstract |
Late-stage age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a common sight-threatening disease of the central retina affecting approximately 1 in 30 Caucasians. Besides age and smoking, common genetic variants from at least 19 gene loci have reproducibly been associated with AMD likely explaining a large proportion of disease. Based on the current knowledge, several models were calculated to predict disease risk each with its own strength and weakness. Here, we review and compare published genetic risk models for AMD with or without additionally accounting for non-genetic factors. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 29% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 21% |
Researcher | 2 | 14% |
Student > Master | 2 | 14% |
Professor | 1 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 1 | 7% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 36% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 21% |
Sports and Recreations | 2 | 14% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 1 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2017.
All research outputs
#20,260,958
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,960
of 4,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,951
of 224,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#22
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,941 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,366 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.