You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Silver as a Disinfectant
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 2 |
| Book title |
Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
|
| Published in |
Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, November 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-0-387-69163-3_2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-0-387-69162-6, 978-0-387-69163-3
|
| Authors |
Nadia Silvestry-Rodriguez, Enue E. Sicairos-Ruelas, Dr. Charles P. Gerba, Kelly R. Bright, Charles P. Gerba, Silvestry-Rodriguez, Nadia, Sicairos-Ruelas, Enue E., Gerba, Charles P., Bright, Kelly R. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 20% |
| Unknown | 8 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 90% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 166 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 36 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 25 | 15% |
| Unknown | 42 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 16% |
| Chemistry | 21 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 7% |
| Engineering | 12 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 38 | 22% |
| Unknown | 50 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2024.
All research outputs
#1,663,736
of 26,367,306 outputs
Outputs from Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#21
of 194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,268
of 298,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,367,306 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,547 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them